富贵 (Wealth and Prosperity)
富贵#1484 by market capNot covered. The criterion it missed: documentation found but no public code repository listed.
富贵 (Wealth and Prosperity) is for dog-themed. We have not written its record yet, so its promises are not checked. It trades at $0.005, #1634 of all coins by size, 41% below its highest ever price.
What it promised, and what it deliveredEvery line is quoted from the project's own pages, with the copy we stored and, where one exists, the article that reported it
No dated promise has been found on the pages this project publishes. Its pages are saved every night, so anything it commits to from now on appears here.
What it is worth against the coins doing the same jobOnly coins within a hundred times its worth; a coin a thousand times bigger is another world
Robinhood Chain Meme: this coin against its direct competitors
- CoinWorth, as a barWorthAgainst this coinToday, and the gapSupplyPromises
富贵 (Wealth and Prosperity)$5.04Mthis coin–no maxno recordArtificial Inu$247.9M49.2× bigger, +$242.85M−22.6%99% outno record
Cash Cat$159.15M31.6× bigger, +$154.11M−9.7%99% outno record
GreenHood$53.2M10.6× bigger, +$48.16M−2.1%100% outno record
A Meme Coin$51.08M10.1× bigger, +$46.04M+10.7%100% outno record
Chump Coin$42.25M8.4× bigger, +$37.2M+2.0%100% outno record
Degen$36.58M7.3× bigger, +$31.54M−3.6%no maxno record
ZZZ$33.96M6.7× bigger, +$28.92M−42.6%no maxno record
Bars are market cap. Order is size, nothing else. Differences are measured from the coin you are looking at.
Robinhood Chain Meme: this coin next to Artificial Inu, the biggest rival within reach. People go to the bigger coin unless the smaller one does something it does not.
- 富贵 (Wealth and Prosperity) says
- .
- Artificial Inu says
- Artificial Inu (AI) is an ERC-20 community token launched through LONG on Robinhood Chain.
Two claims, side by side, in their own words. Whether the difference is real is for the record to show over time, and for you to judge.
The case for it, and the case against
0 of 4
- –A real-world jobDoes it say what problem it solves, in a category that is not a joke?
- –Real backingA named investor, an index, a major exchange, or a billion-dollar size.
- –Something aheadA dated step, deliveries on record, or demand showing up in the news.
- –Room to growWorth at least four times less than the biggest coin doing the same job, so the gap is real, not a guess.
Four tests, printed. Passing all four means a real job, real backing, something ahead, and a price far below the leader of its group. A filter on facts, never a verdict.
It is already worth more than the typical coin in Robinhood Chain Meme ($3.44M). To match the leader, Artificial Inu ($247.9M), its price would need to rise 4817%, to about $0.2479.
Still to check
- No dated promise on record yet, so delivery cannot be judged
- Listed on fewer than two big exchanges
- No named investor among its tags
- Only 0 headlines named it last month
What to do Nothing dated is ahead and nothing has been delivered on record. There is no event to wait for yet, which is itself the answer.
A gap is not a forecast. Most small coins never close it. The site never picks.
Robinhood Chain Meme: this coin next to the group's largest, Artificial Inu.
| 富贵 (Wealth and Prosperity) | Artificial Inu | |
|---|---|---|
| Years trading | 1 months | 1 months |
| Major exchanges | 0 | 0 |
| Named backers | 0 | 0 |
| Headlines, last month | 0 | 39 |
| Promises delivered | no record | no record |
It is 2.0% the size of Artificial Inu. On the facts above it is behind on headlines, last month. For that gap to close, the record would need deliveries showing up in its record, news that names it, listings on major exchanges. Nothing here says it will; the site does not predict.
What it is for
Dog-themed
75 coins tagged Dog-Themed, worth $17.53B together. #32 of 75 by worth.
Each bar is a coin's worth today (price × coins out), longest first. The lit bar is this coin; grey bars are the others doing the same job.
No description on file.
Problem it says it solves: dog-themed. 75 coins are working on it and together they are worth $17,528,459,696. This coin is 0% of that.
What is coming
Nothing dated has been found on its pages, so there is no date to wait for yet.
Price and size
The last 7 days
Where today sits against its highest ever price
Highest ever: $0.0085 on 13 September 2026. Today is 59% of that.
- 1Bin circulation of 1B total. No hard maximum is set, so more can be created.
- of its all-time high of $0.0085 on 13 September 2026. That is −40.7% from the top.
- #1634by market cap, $5,041,360.
- Not checkedwho holds the most coins, and how much has been burned. Those need on-chain data this site does not read yet.
Supply and value figures from CoinGecko, refreshed hourly. Not part of the record.
What holding it gets you
Nothing behind it but attention
No product needs it. Its worth is whatever buyers will pay today.
- Nothing the project's own pages spell out.
That is all a market cap is: today's price times the coins in public hands. It moves every time the price does. It says what buyers are paying, not what the coin is worth.
Who holds the supply
100%
of all 富贵 that will ever exist is already out in public hands: 1B coins.
Nothing is held back. Every coin is already out.
out held back. Each dot is 1%.
Who is behind it
No named backer
- Origin13 September 2026about todayponsfamily.com/launchpad/0xcEEBF25B318201f1F949be2FabBFcEe231737139
- DevelopersNot namedNeither Wikidata nor its listing names the foundersNo public code repository listed
- BackingNo named investorNot on a big exchange we track
- Standing on the recordNo recordNo dated promise to judge yet0 headlines last month10 people keep it on a CoinGecko watchlistNo corrections needed so far
Every line has a source: the coin's own listing, CoinGecko's tags, the record, or the news feed. Reputation here is a count, never an opinion.
What the news says
Nothing in the news this month.
Nothing matched in the last month from the sources we read. CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, Decrypt, The Block, plus Google News searches for coins with a record and the top 100.
The record itselfSix facts, the project's own replies, its peers, contract facts, references and every stored copy
Not covered. The criterion it missed: documentation found but no public code repository listed.